Residual Value-Based Leasing (RVBL)

Saturday 17th February | 10 minute read

Residual value-based leasing is used to lease assets, including vehicles, equipment, plant, and property, and it is particularly prevalent in the automotive industry for leasing cars.

Our Residual Value-Based Leasing service

We arrange Residual Value-Based leasing for high-value assets across a range of industries.

  • Plant and equipment with everything from server racks and warehouse automation to cranes.
  • Factory machinery, including robotics, to production line machinery.
  • Commercial vehicles, large & small, from a single van to a fleet of HGVs.
  • Executive company car fleets with market-leading rates.
  • Available to companies in & England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

2024 Residual Value-Based Leasing (RVBL) Guide

Residual Value-Based Leasing (RVBL) is a popular financing option, especially in the automotive and equipment leasing sectors, focusing on the asset's estimated residual value at the lease's end.

This method calculates lease payments based on the difference between the asset's initial value and projected residual value, plus interest and fees, potentially offering lower monthly payments for lessees. Key features include calculating depreciation, flexible end-of-lease options, and allocating residual value risk to the lessor. While it provides benefits like reduced monthly outlays and flexibility in managing asset usage, it also introduces considerations such as depreciation rates, lease terms, and the potential for additional end-of-lease costs. RVBL is especially suited for users looking to manage the financial implications of asset depreciation while enjoying the benefits of usage without the full responsibilities of ownership.


What is Residual Value-Based Leasing?

Residual Value-Based Leasing is a financing arrangement commonly used to lease assets, including vehicles, equipment, plant and property. It is particularly prevalent in the automotive industry for leasing cars. This type of leasing focuses on the estimated residual value of the leased asset at the end of the lease term.

The key aspects of Residual Value-Based Leasing are Residual Value, Lease Payments, End of Lease Options, Risk of Residual Value, Benefits to Lessees, and their Use in Vehicle Leasing.

Residual Value. This is the anticipated value of the leased asset after the lease period. It is based on predicting how much the asset will depreciate over time. The residual value is a crucial component in calculating monthly lease payments.

Lease Payments. In a residual value-based lease, the lessee pays for the asset's depreciation during the lease term rather than the total value of the asset. Monthly payments are calculated based on the difference between the asset's initial value and its projected residual value at the end of the lease, plus interest and fees. This can result in lower monthly payments compared to traditional financing options, where the full value of the asset is amortised.

End of Lease Options. At the end of the lease term, the lessee typically has several options: return the asset, purchase it for the residual value, or extend the lease. Buying the asset for its residual value allows the lessee to own it outright, potentially at a lower cost than purchasing it new at the beginning of the lease.

Risk of Residual Value. The lessor assumes the risk of the asset's residual value. If the actual residual value is lower than the estimated value at the end of the lease, the lessor bears the loss. Conversely, the lessor may benefit if the actual residual value is higher.

Benefits to Lessees. Lessees benefit from lower monthly payments and the flexibility to return the asset at the lease end without worrying about selling it. This arrangement can be particularly attractive for assets that depreciate quickly or for lessees who prefer to use the latest models of vehicles or equipment.

Use in Vehicle Leasing. In the context of car leasing, this structure allows drivers to lease new cars more affordably and with the option to switch cars every few years without the hassle of selling a used car.

Residual value-based leasing offers a flexible and often more affordable way for individuals and businesses to use assets without owning them outright. However, it also considers depreciation, lease terms, and potential additional costs at lease end.


What are the most important factors to users of Residual Value-Based Leasing?

Residual Value-Based Leasing is a financial arrangement used primarily in leasing assets, such as vehicles and equipment, where the lease payments are calculated based on the residual value of the leased asset at the end of the lease term. The residual value is the asset's estimated value at the end of the lease, considering depreciation and usage over the lease period. This type of leasing can be attractive for lessees and lessors, as it often results in lower monthly payments for the lessee, while the lessor benefits from the potential to sell the asset for its residual value at the end of the lease.

The most important factors to users of Residual Value-Based Leasing include:

Depreciation Rate. The rate at which the leased asset loses value over time is critical, as it directly impacts the residual value and lease payments.

Residual Value. The asset's estimated value at the end of the lease term is a key factor. Higher residual values generally result in lower monthly payments.

Lease Terms. The length of the lease and the conditions under which it operates, including mileage limits for vehicles, maintenance requirements, and termination options, can significantly affect the desirability of the lease.

Monthly Payments. For many lessees, the monthly payment amount is a crucial consideration. Residual value-based leases often offer lower monthly payments, which is a significant attraction.

Wear and Tear Policies. The policy regarding wear and tear, especially for vehicles, can impact the end-of-lease costs. Lessees need to understand acceptable wear and tear to avoid additional charges.

End-of-Lease Options. Options such as purchasing the asset at the end of the lease, extending the lease, or returning the asset are important for lessees to consider.

Market Value Risks. Lessees and lessors face risks related to asset market value changes. Lessees might have options to buy the asset at a predetermined price, which could be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on market conditions.

Tax Benefits and Implications. The tax implications of residual value-based leasing, including potential benefits related to depreciation and expense deductions, are important for lessees and lessors.

Maintenance and Repair Costs. For lessees, understanding who is responsible for maintenance and repair costs during the lease term is crucial, as these can add significantly to the total cost of leasing.

Early Termination Conditions and Costs. The terms under which a lease can be terminated early, and any associated costs are important, as they can affect the flexibility of the leasing arrangement.

These factors are interrelated and can vary widely depending on the type of asset being leased, the lease agreement terms, and the specific needs and priorities of the lessee and lessor.


How Does Residual Value-Based Leasing Work?

Residual Value-Based Leasing incorporates the asset's estimated residual value at the end of the lease period into the lease payment calculation. This approach typically results in lower monthly payments for the lessee, making it an attractive option for acquiring the use of assets without the full cost of ownership.

Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how it works:

Selection of the Asset. The process begins with the lessee choosing the asset they wish to lease, such as a car, equipment, or machinery.

Assessment of the Asset's Value. With experts' help, the lessor often determines the asset's current value. This value is important for calculating the lease payments.

Estimation of the Residual Value. The lessor estimates the asset's residual value at the end of the lease term. This estimation is based on the asset's depreciation rate, expected wear and tear, market trends, and the lease term's length.

Calculation of Lease Payments. The lease payments are calculated based on the difference between the asset's current value and its estimated residual value at the lease end, plus interest and fees. The formula looks like Lease Payment = (Current Value - Estimated Residual Value) / Lease Term + Interest and Fees.

Signing of the Lease Agreement. The lessee and lessor agree to the lease terms, including the lease duration, monthly payments, mileage limits (for vehicles), maintenance obligations, and conditions for early termination.

Lease Term Begins. The lessee takes possession of the asset and makes the agreed-upon monthly payments.

Maintenance and Use. Throughout the lease term, the lessee is responsible for maintaining the asset according to the terms specified in the lease agreement and is usually restricted to a certain level of use (e.g., mileage limits for vehicles).

End of Lease Term. At the end of the lease term, the lessee has several options, typically outlined in the lease agreement. These options might include returning the asset to the lessor, purchasing it for its residual value, or extending the lease.

Asset Return and Inspection. If the lessee chooses to return the asset, it is inspected for condition. Charges may be applied for excessive wear and tear or for exceeding any use limits specified in the lease agreement.

Completion of the Lease. The lease agreement is concluded once the asset is returned and any end-of-lease terms are settled (or the lessee purchases the asset).

This leasing model is popular for assets that tend to depreciate quickly, such as vehicles and technology equipment, because it offers a way to manage depreciation costs effectively. The accuracy of the residual value estimation is critical, as it affects the lessor's profitability and the attractiveness of the lease terms to the lessee.


What are the disadvantages of Residual Value-Based Leasing?

Residual Value-Based Leasing, while advantageous in many scenarios, has several potential disadvantages for lessees and lessors. Understanding these drawbacks is crucial for parties considering this leasing model. Here are some of the main disadvantages:

For Lessees:

Higher Total Cost. Over the long term, leasing can be more expensive than purchasing an asset outright due to cumulative lease payments and potential end-of-lease fees.

Mileage and Usage Restrictions. Leases often come with mileage limits and restrictions on use, which can be inconvenient for lessees needing more flexibility. Exceeding these limits can result in significant additional charges.

Wear and Tear Charges. Lessees may face additional fees for any damage beyond normal wear and tear, which can be a subjective assessment and lead to unexpected costs at the end of the lease.

Lack of Ownership. Since the lessee does not own the asset, they build no equity. Any investment in the leased asset, such as customisations, is lost at the end of the lease term.

Early Termination Costs. Terminating the lease early can be costly, with fees often designed to recover the lessor's expected profits from the lease.

For Lessors:

Residual Value Risk. The lessor bears the risk of the asset's residual value being lower than estimated due to market fluctuations, unexpected depreciation, or excessive wear and tear. This can result in financial losses if the asset cannot be sold for the anticipated amount at the end of the lease.

Asset Condition and Maintenance. Lessors rely on lessees to maintain the asset properly. Poor maintenance can reduce the asset's residual value and marketability.

Market Risks. Changes in market demand can affect the asset's residual value. Lessors face the risk of declining market prices for certain types of assets, which can impact profitability.

Repossession Costs. If the lessee defaults on the lease, the lessor may incur costs associated with repossessing the asset and the potential loss of income during the period the asset is not leased.

For Both Parties:

Complexity and Uncertainty. Calculating lease payments based on estimated residual values adds complexity and can introduce uncertainty regarding future costs and values. This can make it more difficult for both parties to plan financially.

Contractual Limitations. The lease agreement's terms can be restrictive, limiting lessees' asset usage and imposing specific obligations on lessors, which may not always align with either party's changing needs or circumstances.

While Residual Value-Based Leasing can offer benefits like lower monthly payments and flexibility in managing assets, these potential disadvantages highlight the importance of carefully considering individual needs, financial situations, and risk tolerance before entering such agreements.


What are the alternatives to Residual Value-Based Leasing?

Residual Value-Based Leasing offers several advantages, particularly lower monthly payments and flexibility at the lease's end. However, there are alternatives to consider, each with its own set of benefits and potential drawbacks, depending on the lessee's needs, financial situation, and preferences:

Straight-Line Leasing (Fixed Lease). Unlike residual value-based leasing, straight-line or fixed leases do not factor in the asset's residual value for calculating lease payments. Payments are determined based on the total value of the asset over the lease term, often resulting in higher monthly payments than residual value-based leases. This option might be preferable for lessees who plan to use the asset extensively without concerns about exceeding usage limits or incurring end-of-lease condition penalties.

Operating Lease. Operating leases are similar to residual value-based leases but are typically shorter in duration and often used for equipment and machinery. The lessee pays to use the asset but returns it at the end of the lease term, with no option to purchase. This benefits quickly obsolete assets or businesses that frequently update their equipment.

Finance Lease (Capital Lease). In a finance lease, the lessee effectively takes on the economic responsibilities of ownership, including maintenance and depreciation, even though the lessor retains legal ownership. At the end of the lease term, the lessee usually can purchase the asset at a residual value. This can be a good choice for lessees who intend to keep the asset long-term.

Hire Purchase. Hire purchase agreements allow the lessee to purchase the asset through several instalments. Unlike leasing, each payment contributes towards the ownership of the asset, with the lessee eventually owning the asset outright. This can be an attractive option for those who want to own the asset but cannot afford or prefer not to pay the full price upfront.

Loan Financing. Instead of leasing, purchasing the asset with a loan allows for immediate ownership. This method requires the lessee (now buyer) to take a loan for the asset's purchase, paying it back over time with interest. This is suitable for those who prefer ownership and the benefits it brings, such as depreciation and possible tax deductions.

Peer-to-Peer Leasing. An emerging alternative facilitated by technology platforms where individuals or businesses lease assets directly from each other. This can offer more flexibility and potentially lower costs but may come with higher risks regarding the condition and maintenance of the asset.

Subscription Services. For certain assets, especially vehicles, subscription services offer an all-inclusive package that covers the use of the asset, maintenance, insurance, and sometimes even fuel. Subscriptions offer great flexibility and simplicity but may be more expensive in the long run.

Choosing the right financing or leasing option depends on several factors, including the asset type, financial considerations, usage needs, and the desire for ownership versus flexibility. Each alternative has unique advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice will vary depending on individual or organisational priorities and circumstances.

Final thoughts

In conclusion, Residual Value-Based Leasing (RVBL) represents a versatile and economically viable option for businesses and individuals looking to leverage high-value assets across various industries.

By offering a structured approach that centres around the asset's projected residual value, RVBL facilitates lower monthly payments and flexibility in asset management and end-of-lease decisions. Whether for leasing commercial vehicles, executive car fleets, plant and equipment, or factory machinery, RVBL addresses the unique needs of companies throughout England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. As we navigate through the complexities and considerations of asset leasing, RVBL stands out as a strategic solution that aligns with the evolving demands of modern business operations, offering a balance between cost efficiency and the dynamic use of assets.


We're financial experts who arrange Residual Value-based Leasing (a form of asset finance) for business owners, securing the best rates and terms from over 200 UK lenders, including private equity firms, investors and family offices.

Get expert assistance today, we're on hand to answer any questions about asset finance.

Get a quote

Call our friendly team on 01202 612934we're ready to help.

We use cookies. By using the website you agree with our use of cookies. For more information, please read our privacy policy.

Okay, got it!